The Histories
Historiae
Headnote
The Histories (Historiae) was Sallust’s last and most ambitious work, a year-by-year account in five books of Roman affairs from 78 BC, the year of Sulla’s death, into the late 70s. Unlike the two monographs it does not survive whole: the continuous narrative is lost, and what remains is a wreckage of fragments preserved by later grammarians and anthologists — single sentences quoted for a rare word, a paragraph saved as a model of style. What this edition can offer, therefore, is not the work but its great set pieces: the four speeches and two letters that were copied out nearly entire because antiquity prized them as rhetoric, and which alone among the contents of the Histories come down to us as self-contained wholes.
These six pieces map the post-Sullan decade and its discontents. The speech of Lepidus (78 BC) is the consul Marcus Aemilius Lepidus rousing the people against the dead dictator’s settlement; the speech of Philippus answers it in the Senate, demanding that Lepidus’s revolt be crushed by force. The speech of Cotta (75 BC) is a beleaguered consul offering his own life to a people embittered by war and dearth; the letter of Pompey (around 74 BC) is an angry dispatch from the Spanish front, the young general warning the Senate that his unpaid army will march on Italy if it is not supplied. The speech of Macer (73 BC) is a tribune’s call to the commons to reclaim the tribunician power Sulla had gutted. Last and most famous is the letter of Mithridates to the Parthian king Arsaces, a king’s manifesto against Rome that reads the rise of the empire from the outside, as a history of treachery and limitless greed.
Each piece is individuated rhetoric in a distinct voice — Lepidus’s incendiary populism, Philippus’s clenched optimate scorn, Cotta’s near-suicidal pathos, Pompey’s blunt soldier’s grievance, Macer’s grinding insistence on a single demand, Mithridates’ grand and bitter anatomy of Roman conquest — and the translation keeps them apart rather than flattening them to one Senate-floor tone. Because the connective narrative is gone, each is rendered here as the freestanding unit it has become; this headnote and the glossary carry the historical context that the lost surrounding books once supplied. The Latin follows the Perseus digital edition (phi0631.phi003), which preserves the conventional fragment order and a number of corrupt or lacunose readings; the project’s translator’s log records the points where a disputed text affected the rendering.